The Preemptive and Preventive Use of Force in Response to WMD Proliferation
The Institute for Law, Science, and Global Security's co-sponsored program on Nonproliferation Policy and Law assisted the International Society for Military Law and the Law of War in hosting a conference on the use of preemptive and preventive force to combat WMD proliferation. The conference was held on October 27, 2009, in Brussels, Belgium, in cooperation with NATO and other international organizations. The conference's objective was to analyze the rights of states under customary international law and the UN Charter to use force to counter the proliferation of WMD. For more information about the conference, please see:
Conference Summary
Conference Schedule
Panelists from the Institute's January 2009 event about the right to use preventive force under international law, including Mr. Guy Roberts, were also speakers at the Brussels panel. The Institute and the Project on Nonproliferation Policy and Law continue to analyze evolving state practice and international opinion concerning the use of preventive force. For more information about the January Preventive War Panel, please click
here
Conference Summary
Conference Schedule
Panelists from the Institute's January 2009 event about the right to use preventive force under international law, including Mr. Guy Roberts, were also speakers at the Brussels panel. The Institute and the Project on Nonproliferation Policy and Law continue to analyze evolving state practice and international opinion concerning the use of preventive force. For more information about the January Preventive War Panel, please click
here
Exploring International Law Blog
- Complete Text: Alberto Mora discussing torture and cruel and inhuman treatment of detainees in Georgetown’s William V. O’Brien Lecture in International Law and Morality
- May 15- Book Launch: Strategic Thinking in 3D: A Guide for National Security, Foreign Policy, and Business Professionals, by Ross Harrison
- Breaking News: Supreme Court rules there is a presumption against the extraterritorial applicability of the Alien Tort Statute

